臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來，資訊技術 (information technology, IT) 之發展已被視為二十一世紀高科技產業規劃的重要項目，而顯示器 (display) 乃是資訊技術發展中極為重要之一環，已有50年歷史的陰極射線映像管 (cathode ray tube, CRT) ，逐漸被輕、薄、短、小之液晶顯示器 (liquid crystal display, LCD) 所取代。

在中小尺寸TFT-LCD產業競爭日益劇烈情況下，業者為強化競爭力紛紛將產能及品質系統等優質化，才能在競爭激烈的市場上求生存。其中基於降低製造成本之策略考量，業者將原尺寸之投入基板由生產大尺寸面板轉型為中小尺寸面板，因而衍生在相同之投入數下產出大增，同時尚需考慮市場供需之季節性變化，故不額外投資擴廠擴線以分擔營運風險等考量因素下，代工策略因而相繼衍生。鑒於目前有關TFT-LCD外包評鑑之學術研究不多，且無適當交流管道，多數靠個人經驗累積而來，故希望藉由本研究對TFT-LCD產業外包評鑑制度之專家訪談，透過學術研究整理分析所得之結果，期可供相關產業參考，並冀望對台灣企業於外包評選制度之研究有所貢獻。

Information technology (IT) is one of the most important techniques of the 21 century and display plays an important role in the IT world. The TFT LCD monitors substitute the CRTs that have been used for longer than 50 years step by step. The key characteristics of TFT LCD are light, slim and small.

In order to gain profits and stand well in the competitive small/middle FPD (Flat Panel Display) markets, companies should enhance their quality system and enlarge the capacity. The strategy of outsourcing is introdued to reduce the risk with transforming large size into small/middle size FPD. These risks include costs, changeable and un-predictive market and large investment of facility and manufacturing equipments.

For these years, outsourcing evaluation systems have received little attention and most of them were set up by the personnel experience without standard rule. This research provides a new outsourcing evaluation system of small/middle size FPD by collecting information from experts and analysing through academic research. The evaluation procedure proposed in this research can provide enterprise with the necessary experience and advice gives the enterprise a proper model to choose the best subcontractor and it is useful for companies to adopt in the future.

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii

第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 2
1.3 研究目的 2
1.4 研究範圍 2
1.5 研究流程 3

第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1 TFT-LCD發展近況 4
2.2 外包相關文獻回顧 5
2.2.1 外包之定義 5
2.2.2 外包之目的與效益 7
2.2.3 外包與顧客之關係 8
2.3 廠商評選程序 9
2.4 廠商評選指標 10
2.5 廠商評選方法 15
2.6 層級分析法之理論基礎18

第三章 研究方法 22
3.1 研究設計 22
3.2 研究方法 22
3.3 研究工具 28
3.3.1 訪談問卷規劃 29
3.3.2 層級分析法 31
3.4 資料分析方法 35
3.5 TFT-LCD MODULE製程簡介 35
3.5.1 TFT-LCD介紹 36
3.5.2 TFT-LCD Module製程介紹 38

第四章 實證結果與分析 42
4.1 訪談對象資料分析 42
4.2 訪談資料彙整 42
4.3 調查結果分析與探討 48
4.4 實證分析 50

第五章 結論與建議 53
5.1 研究結論 53
5.2 研究建議 54
5.3 未來研究方向與限制 54

參考文獻 56
附錄 60

1.Aertsen, E., “Contracting out the physical distribution function: a trade-off between asset specificity and performance management,” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics management, 23, 23-29 (l993).
2.Akomode, O. J., Lees, B. and Irgens, C., “Constructing customized models and providing information to support IT outsourcing decisions,” Logistics Information Management, 11, 114-127 (1998).
3.Barbarosoglu, G. and Yazgac, T., “An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, 38, 14-21 (1997).
4.Chan, F. T. S., “Performance measurement in a supply chain,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21, 534-548 (2003).
5.Dickson, G. W., “An analysis of vender selection systems and decisions,” Journal of Purchasing, 2, 5-17 (1996).
6.Domberger, S., The Contracting Organization: A Strategic Guide to Outsourcing, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. (1998).
7.Dryden, P., Outsourcing, with Safeguards, Can Solve Client/Server Problems, Computer World, Framingham (1998).
8.Ellram ,L., “The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 22, 2-8 (1990).
9.Evans, R. H., “Product involvement and industrial buying,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 18, 23-28. (1982).
10.Goffin, K., Szwejczewski, M. and New, C., “Managing suppliers: when fewer can mean more,” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 27, 422-436(1997).
11.Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C. and McGaughey, R. E., “A framework for supply chain performance measurement,” International Journal of Production Economics, 87, 333-347(2004).
12.Houshyar, A. and David, L., “A systematic selection procedure,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, 23, 173-176 (1992).
13.Judenberg, J., “Applications maintenance outsourcing,” Information System Management, 11, 34-38 (1994).
14.Kasilingam, R. G. and Lee, C. P., “Selection of vendors: a mixed-integer programming approach,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, 31, 347-350 (1996).
15.Choy, K. L., Lee, W. B., Lau, H. C. W. and Choy, L.C., “A knowledge-based supplier intelligence retrieval system for outsource manufacturing,” Journal of Knowledge-Based Systems, 18, 1-17 (2005)
16.Lehmann, D. R. and O’Shaughnessy, J., “Decision criteria used in buying different categories of products,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 18, 9-14 (1992).
17.Lever, S., “An analysis of managerial motivation behind outsourcing practices in human resources,” Human Resource Planning, 20, 37-47 (1997).
18.Lomas, P.N., “The implications of outsourcing,” Frozen Food Age, 46, 33-36 (1997).
19.Mohanty, R. P. and Deshmukh, S. G., ，“Using of analytic hierarchic process for evaluating sources of supply,” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 23, 22-28 (1993).
20.Oliveira, R. C. and Lourenco, J. C., “A multi-criteria model for assigning new orders to service supplier,” European Journal of Operational Research, 139, 390-399 (2002).
21.Patton, W. E., “Use of human judgment models in industrial buyers’ vender selection decisions,” Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 134-149 (1996).
22.Perry, C. R., “Outsourcing and union power,” Journal of Labor Research, 18, 521-534 (1997).
23.Quinn, J. B., “Strategic outsourcing: Leveraging knowledge capabilities,” Sloan Management Review, 40, 9-21 (1999).
24.Satty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. (1980).
25.Sharpe, M., “Outsourcing, organizational competitiveness and work,” Journal of Labor Research, 18, 535-549 (1997).
26.Thompson, K. N., “Vendor profile analysis,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26, 11-19 (1990).
27.Tracey, M. and Tan, C. L., “Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance,” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6, 174-188 (2001).
28.Weber, C. A., Current J. R. and Benton W. C., “Vendor selection criteria and methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2-18 (1991).
29.Weber, C. A. and Current, J. R., “A multiobjective approach to vendor selection,” European Journal of Operational Research, 68, 173-176 (1993).
30.Wilson, E. J., “The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: a review and update,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30, 35-41 (1994).
31.Zahedi, F., “The analytic hierarchy process-a survey of the method and its applications,” Interfaces, 16, 96-108 (1986).
32.江柏謙，「以層級分析法探討海軍裝備系統維修廠商評鑑之研究」，義守大學工業工程管理學系研究所碩士論文，2003。
33.李輝鈞，「台灣中小尺寸TFT-LCD專業製造廠競爭優勢分析」，國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文，2003。
34.邱美玲，「製造業供應商的選擇與評估」，國立台灣科技大學管理技術研究所碩士論文，1994。
35.吳琮璠、謝清佳，資訊管理-理論與實務，智勝書局，台北，1998。
36.徐哲明，「AHP電子連接器性業供應商管理之研究」，中華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文，2002。
37.陳怡和，「供應商管理標竿之建立與分析—以台灣筆記型電腦產業為例」，元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，1998。
38.陳俞君、楊素真譯，Lewis, J. D. ，透視策略聯盟：克萊斯勒、摩托羅拉、飛利浦等跨國企業致勝謀略，遠流出版社，台北 (1997)。
39.陳曉琪，「供應商遴選之決策支援系統之研究」，義守大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，2001。
40.許振邦，如何選擇合適的供應商，採購雜誌，中國採購管理協會，58-60，1998。
41.黃子賢，「供應商遴選模式之建立」，國立雲林科技大學工業工程與管理技術系，國科會大學生參與專題研究計畫成果報告 (1997)。
42.黃智偉，「供應鏈管理下供應商選擇評估之研究—以臺灣地區中衛體系之汽機車業與電腦資訊業為例」，國立雲林科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文，2000。
43.張朝堂，「少量多樣之電子專業代工製造優勢研究—以中小型電子公司為例」，南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文，2003。
44.鄧振源、曾國雄「層級分析法的內涵特性與應用 (上)」，中國統計學報，27，5-22 (1989)。
45.簡至鵬，「TFT/LCD產業協同產品設計程序發展」，中原大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，2001。
46.賴穎傑，「多階多廠區生產規劃─以TFT-LCD產業為例」，東海大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，2002。